Downloady z ChinafanSims

3. august 2015 at 15:43 | Daewoo |  ChinafanSims
Ahoj všichni!
Dnes jsem konečně dokončil stěhování downloadů z této stránky do přehlednějších rubrik. Doufám že to teď bude pro vás více přehlednější a že rychleji najdete download, který budete hledat. Usmívající se
Zrušení stránky: okolo září roku 2011
Kategorie: Tělo (oblečení, make-up a genetika), objetky, domy a vlasy.
Zaměření: The sims 2
TĚLO-Na mém blogu najdete pouze zlomek oblečení, make-upu a genetiky z této stránky. (Šlo mi kompletně uložit pouze 27 stránek z celkových 127 stánek. Na ty zbývající stránky se ještě musím podívat, ale myslím si že už z toho moc nevytřískám.)
OBJEKTY- Na mém blogu najdete pouze část, protože to nemám ještě probrané až do konce.
DOMY-Většina domů je uložených na mém blogu.
Vlasy-Ty teprve plánuji uložit.
Oblečení-141 souborů
Make-up-21 souborů
Genetika-23 souborů
Parcely (domy) "loty": 94 souborů
Objekty: 15 souborů
Doplňky: 1 soubor

Be the first one to judge this article.


Zajímáš se o Asijskou kulturu?



1 Williambut Williambut | Email | Web | 30. june 2017 at 19:14 | React

?How to jot down a Comparative Analysis
Throughout your academic career, you'll be asked to write down papers in which you compare and contrast two things: two texts, two theories, two historical figures, two scientific processes, and so on. "Classic" compare-and-contrast papers, in which you weight A and B equally, may be about two similar things that have crucial differences (two pesticides with different effects for the environment) or two similar things that have crucial differences, yet turn out to have surprising commonalities (two politicians with vastly different world views who voice unexpectedly similar perspectives on sexual harassment).
With the "lens" (or "keyhole") comparison, in which you weight A less heavily than B, you utilize a as a lens through which to watch B. Just as searching through a pair of glasses changes the way you see an object, working with A as a framework for understanding B changes the way you see B. Lens comparisons are useful for illuminating, critiquing, or challenging the stability of the thing that, before the analysis, seemed perfectly understood. Often, lens comparisons take time into account: earlier texts, events, or historical figures may illuminate later ones, and vice versa.
Faced using a daunting list of seemingly unrelated similarities and differences, you may really feel confused about how to construct a paper that isn't just a mechanical exercise in which you very first state all the capabilities that A and B have in popular, and then state all the ways in which A and B are different. Predictably, the thesis of these kinds of a paper is usually an assertion that A and B are very similar yet not so similar after all. To write down a really good compare-and-contrast paper, you must take your raw data-the similarities and differences you've observed-and make them cohere into a meaningful argument. Listed here are the 5 parts required.
Frame of Reference . This is the context inside which you location the two things you plan to compare and contrast; it is the umbrella less than which you have grouped them. The frame of reference may consist of an idea, theme, question, problem, or theory; a group of similar things from which you extract two for special attention; biographical or historical important information. The optimum frames of reference are constructed from precise resources rather than your individual thoughts or observations. Thus, in the paper comparing how two writers redefine social norms of masculinity, you would be a lot better off quoting a sociologist relating to the topic of masculinity than spinning out potentially banal-sounding theories of your personal. Most assignments tell you exactly what the frame of reference should be, and most courses supply resources for constructing it. In case you encounter an assignment that fails to offer you a frame of reference, you must come up with 1 on your have. A paper without this sort of a context would have no angle for the material, no focus or frame for your writer to propose a meaningful argument.
Grounds for Comparison . Let's say you're creating a paper on worldwide food distribution, and you've chosen to compare apples and oranges. Why these particular fruits? Why not pears and bananas? The rationale behind your choice, the grounds for comparison . allows your reader know why your choice is deliberate and meaningful, not random. For instance, inside of a paper asking how the "discourse of domesticity" is utilized on the abortion discussion, the grounds for comparison are obvious; the issue has two conflicting sides, pro-choice and pro-life. Within a paper comparing the effects of acid rain on two forest sites, your choice of sites is less obvious. A paper focusing on similarly aged forest stands in Maine in addition to the Catskills will be put in place differently from 1 comparing a new forest stand inside of the White Mountains with the old forest around the same region. You'll need to indicate the reasoning behind your choice.
Thesis. The grounds for comparison anticipates the comparative nature of your thesis. As in any argumentative paper, your thesis statement will convey the gist of your argument, which necessarily follows from your frame of reference. But in the compare-and-contrast, the thesis relies upon on how the two things you've chosen to compare actually relate to just one another. Do they increase, corroborate, complicate, contradict, correct, or discussion a single another? During the most popular compare-and-contrast paper-one focusing on differences-you can indicate the precise relationship around A and B by utilizing the word "whereas" into your thesis:
Whereas Camus perceives ideology as secondary to the absolutely need to address a precise historical moment of colonialism, Fanon perceives a revolutionary ideology as being the impetus to reshape Algeria's history inside a direction toward independence.
Whether your paper focuses primarily on difference or similarity, you wish to make the relationship relating to A and B clear into your thesis. This relationship is within the heart of any compare-and-contrast paper.
Organizational Scheme. Your introduction will include your frame of reference, grounds for comparison, and thesis. There are two primary ways to organize the body of your paper.
In text-by-text . you discuss all of the, then all of B.
In point-by-point . you alternate points about A with comparable points about B.
In case you think that B extends A, you'll probably make use of a text-by-text scheme; in the event you see A and B engaged in discussion, a point-by-point scheme will draw attention to the conflict. Be aware, however, that the point-by- point scheme can come off as a ping-pong game. It is possible to avoid this effect by grouping even more than an individual point together, thereby cutting down around the quantity of times you alternate from the to B. But no matter which organizational scheme you choose, you will need not give equal time to similarities and differences. In fact, your paper will be further interesting at any time you get to the heart of your argument as immediately as available. Thus, a paper on two evolutionary theorists' different interpretations of targeted archaeological findings would have as couple as two or three sentences during the introduction on similarities and at most a paragraph or two to setup the contrast involving the theorists' positions. The rest of your paper, whether organized text- by-text or point-by-point, will treat the two theorists' differences.
It is possible to organize a classic compare-and-contrast paper either text-by-text or point-by-point. But within a "lens" comparison, in which you spend significantly less time over a (the lens) than on B (the focal textual content), you almost always organize text-by-text. That's as A and B are not strictly comparable: A is merely a device for helping you discover whether or not B's nature is actually what expectations have led you to definitely believe it is.
Linking of the and B . All argumentative papers require you to definitely link every single point from the argument again to the thesis. Without these kinds of links, your reader will be unable to see how new sections logically and systematically advance your argument. In a very compare-and contrast, you also will need to make links relating to A and B within the body of your essay those that want your paper to hold together. To make these links, use transitional expressions of comparison and contrast ( similarly, moreover, likewise, relating to the contrary, conversely, about the other hand ) and contrastive vocabulary (with the example below, Southerner/Northerner ).
As a girl raised during the faded glory within the Old South, amid mystical tales of magnolias and moonlight, the mother remains part of the dying technology. Surrounded by hard times, racial conflict, and restricted opportunities, Julian, to the other hand . feels repelled by the provincial nature of home, and represents a new Southerner, a person who sees his indigenous land through a condescending Northerner's eyes.
Copyright 1998, Kerry Walk, to the Creating Center at Harvard University

New comment

Log in
  Don't you have your own web yet? Create it for free on

Actual articles